Forum
Active Directory Maximum Limits - Scalability
- Maximum Number of Objects
- Maximum Number of Security Identifiers
- Group Memberships for Security Principals
- FQDN Length Limitations
- File Name Length Limitations
- Additional Name Length Limitations
- Maximum Number of GPOs Applied
- Trust Limitations
- Maximum Number of Accounts per LDAP Transaction
- Recommended Maximum Number of Users in a Group
- Recommended Maximum Number of Domains in a Forest
- Recommended Maximum Number of Domain Controllers in a Domain
- Recommended Maximum Kerberos Settings
Maximum Number of Objects
Each
domain controller in an Active Directory forest can create a little bit
less than 2.15 billion objects during its lifetime.
Each
Active Directory domain controller has a unique identifier that is
specific to the individual domain controller. These identifiers, which
are called Distinguished Name Tags (DNTs), are not replicated or
otherwise visible to other domain controllers. The range of values for
DNTs is from 0 through 2,147,483,393 (231
minus 255). As objects are created on a domain controller, a unique
value is used. A DNT is not reused when an object is deleted.
Therefore, domain controllers are limited to creating approximately
2 billion objects (including objects that are created through
replication). This limit applies to the aggregate of all objects from
all partitions (domain NC, configuration, schema, and any application
directory partitions) that are hosted on the domain controller.
Because
new domain controllers start with low initial DNT values (typically,
anywhere from 100 up to 2,000), it may be possible to work around the
domain controller lifetime creation limit—assuming, of course, that the
domain is currently maintaining less than 2 billion objects. For
example, if the lifetime creation limit is reached because
approximately 2 billion objects are created, but 500 million objects
are removed from the domain (for example, deleted and then permanently
removed from the database through the garbage collection process),
installing a new domain controller and allowing it to replicate the
remaining objects from the existing domain controllers is a potential
workaround. However, it is important that the new domain controller
receives the objects through replication and that such domain
controllers not be promoted with the Install from Media (IFM) option.
Domain controllers that are installed with IFM inherit the DNT values
from the domain controller that was used to create the IFM backup.
At
the database level, the error that occurs when the DNT limit is reached
is “Error: Add: Operations Error. <1> Server error: 000020EF:
SvcErr: DSID-0208044C, problem 5012 (DIR_ERROR), data -1076.”
Maximum Number of Security Identifiers
There
is a limit of approximately 1 billion security identifiers (SIDs) over
the life of a domain. This limit is due to the size of the global
relative identifier (RID) pool of 30 bits that makes each SID (that is
assigned to user, group, and computer accounts) in a domain unique. The
actual limit is 230 or 1,073,741,823 RIDs.
Because RIDs are not reused—even if security principals are deleted—the
maximum limit applies, even if there are less than 1 billion security
principals in the domain.
Note |
---|
RIDs are assigned in blocks of 500 by default from the domain controller that holds the RID operations master role in each domain. If a domain controller is demoted, the unused RIDs that were allocated to the domain controller are not returned to the global RID pool and are therefore no longer available for use in the domain. |
When
all the available RIDs are assigned for a domain, the Directory Service
log in the Application and Service Logs of Event Viewer also displays
Event ID 16644 from an event log source of the Security Accounts
Manager (SAM) that reads “The maximum domain account identifier value
has been reached. No further account-identifier pools can be allocated
to domain controllers in this domain.” If you run Dcdiag when all the
available RIDs are assigned for a domain, you see the error message
“The DS has corrupt data: rIDAvailablePool value is not valid.”
A
partial work-around to this limitation is to create an additional
domain to hold accounts and then migrate accounts to the new domain.
However, you must create a trust relationship to migrate accounts in
advance of reaching the limit. Creating a trust requires the creation
of a security principal, which is also known as a trust user account.
For more information about this limit, see articles 316201 ( http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=115211 ) and 305475 ( http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=115212 ) in the Microsoft Knowledge Base.
Note |
---|
The Active Directory database does not set limits on the number of objects in a container, such as organizational units (OUs). You might experience limits when you work with multiple thousands of objects. These limits are configured to help provide a certain level of application or service availability. For example, the Active Directory Users and Computers snap-in is configured by default to display a maximum of 2,000 objects per container. You can adjust this value by using the Filter Options settings on the View menu. There are also adjustable Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) policies that are set by default to improve domain controller performance. These policies are described in article 315071 in the Microsoft Knowledge Base ( http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=135481 ). |
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756101%28WS.10%29.aspx
Hocam çok yararlı bir link .. teşekkürler.
Danışman - ITSTACK Bilgi Sistemleri
****************************************************************
Probleminiz Çözüldüğünde Sonucu Burada Paylaşırsanız.
Sizde Aynı Problemi Yaşayanlar İçin Yardım Etmiş Olursunuz.
Eğer sorununuz çözüldü ise lütfen "çözüldü" olarak işaretlerseniz diğer üyeler için çok büyük kolaylık sağlayacaktır.
*****************************************************************